- #Capture one vs lightroom pro
- #Capture one vs lightroom software
- #Capture one vs lightroom iso
- #Capture one vs lightroom professional
The major steps which I take in Capture One are to choose the appropriate camera profile, do a white balance, and then set black point and white point. I then do a quick ranking of my images, selecting those that I anticipate working on further, and then group these together. I don’t erase the cards until I have verified that both copies are well and truly copied. I use C1 to ingest the files into a new "Session", copying the cards to two drives simultaneously. I perform roughly half the steps in C1 and the other half in Lightroom. My workflow consists of ingesting, browsing and ranking, raw conversion, and then post processing and cataloging, with printing as the usual final step.
#Capture one vs lightroom iso
Phase One 645 and 45mm lens with P65+ back ISO 100
#Capture one vs lightroom pro
Some photographers with Canon and Nikon pro gear may also want to use C1, not only for it’s very high quality raw conversion, but also because it offers very versatile tethering with these cameras when doing studio work. How then do I integrate the two into a smooth workflow? In late 2008 I started using a Sony A900 camera system and found that C1 did a very good jobwith the A900’s files, and over the years have also been pleased with its output from Canon and Nikon files.īut, for me Lightroom offers such compelling workflow and post processing efficiencies that I use it as well for all my images. I know several Phase One back owners who corroborate this with their own tests and experience. Since I currently own a Phase One P65+ back ( and have had other Phase backs previously) I have always used Capture One, and though I have also used Adobe Camera Raw and Lightroom for the sake of convenience when they have supported the backs that I’ve been using, I always saw noticeably superior raw image conversion from C1. There’s also no printing engine, but where Capture One excels is in the basic act of converting a raw file into a demosaiced image.
It lacks the DAM features of Lightroom and some of the more advanced image editing tools such as brushes and gradients. But along the way between Rev 3 and Rev 4 Phase One lost about two years and a great deal of market momentum.Ĭapture One (C1) is now at version 4.8, and has evolved once again into a very fine raw program. Five years ago Capture One was regarded as the top-ranked raw program by many photographers. _ The Capture One Factorīut as good as Lightroom is, and it’s very good indeed, for several reasons I also need to and like to use Phase One’s Capture One.
#Capture one vs lightroom professional
On a professional basis I find Lightroom’s feature set more compelling, and as a journalist and educator my involvement with Lightroom ( including the training videosthat I’ve produced together with Jeff Schewe) have greater relevance to the overall photographic community, because Lightroom is available for both Mac and Windows while Aperture is Mac only. The first is simply personal – I find its interface more intuitive. While I respect Aperture’s capabilities, and as a devout Mac user find the idea of using it appealing, in the end I have selected Lightroom for several reasons. Many, myself included, now rarely use Photoshop except for a few specialized tasks.Īs regular readers know I am a big fan of Lightroom. With their also included web and slide show modules such programs have essentially rendered Photoshopredundant for maybe 90% of the needs of most photographers. Programs like Adobe’s Lightroomand Apple’s Aperture, in addition to being raw processing programs are now fairly complete digital asset managers and printing engines. So, as a photographer, your preference should be determined by how and what you intend to shoot.Over the past several years there has been a dramatic change in the abilities and features of raw processing software. It’s color profile catalog also provides some additional perks that Ted addresses towards the end.
#Capture one vs lightroom software
Lightroom is also a highly capable software but, it is apparently not designed with such a narrow focus.
That is to ask, what kinds of imagery is the software best suite to edit? This, in turn, determines the approach to how the software interprets the data in images.īoth Capture One and Lightroom have to utilize a point of reference for color rendition, however, Capture One seems to have a broader library of colors from which draw upon.Ĭapture one seems better suited to reproduce the gradual changes in color, which makes sense since it is a software developed for Phase One medium format cameras cameras used for highly detailed imagery. What it ultimately comes down to is the intended purpose of the software. There are three aspects of image creation process to consider when trying to understand this:
0 kommentar(er)
